Pin It
Apr
17

Roseanne Looks Great

Roseanne Header

Apr
11

Adjudication in the The Case of the Pope: Global Child Trafficking and Murder

From Kevin Annett

The International Common Law Court of Justice – Criminal Trial Division, Brussels

 

Adjudication in the The Case of the Pope: Global Child Trafficking and Murder

Public Information Bulletin No. 2: An Update from the Citizen Prosecutor’s Office

lThursday, April 10, 2014 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE PUBLIC RELEASE

Summary:

The common law trial in absentia of the three top officials of the Vatican and the Church of England – Jorge Bergoglio, Adolfo Pachon and Justin Welby – began last Monday, April 7 with the opening arguments of the Citizen Prosecutor. The Court convened in closed session under tight security, presided by five Magistrates and a complete Court room staff, along with twenty seven sworn Jury members.

The Prosecutor has spent the past three days presenting affidavits or videotaped statements from sixteen (16) witnesses from Canada, the United States of America, England and Holland. These witnesses’ statements and evidence address the complicity of the Defendants or their agents in the sexual and financial trafficking and the ritual rape, torture and murder of children in these countries.

The Prosecution will be calling upon the first of these witnesses to be present in Court for examination and questioning commencing the week of Monday, April 14, when the Special Assistant to the Prosecutor, Reverend Kevin Annett, will also be present in Court to give testimony and assistance.

Here are some details from the Prosecution’s case evidence:

  1. The Prosecution’s evidence falls into three categories: Institutional Genocide, Child Sacrifice and Ritual Killing, and Child Trafficking. Each of these will be addressed by the witnesses and corroborating material.

  2. The sixteen witnesses in this first round of evidence have direct, firsthand experience and knowledge of the role of the Defendants and their agents in all of these crimes, including in the so-called NINTH CIRCLE child sacrificial cult. Besides participants in this cult and survivors of government experimental programs, these witnesses include former officials of the Roman Catholic and Anglican churches, retired and serving policemen, indigenous elders, a retired senior politician from England, an operative of the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service (CSIS), and a former civil servant in the Argentine military junta.

  3. The Prosecution has also received an affidavit from Rev. Kevin Annett, ITCCS Field Secretary, that connects his own victimization by church and state in Canada with his discovery of the activity of NINTH CIRCLE members at Indian residential schools across Canada, and with the continued murder of indigenous women and children by this Circle on the west coast of Canada. Rev. Annett will appear in Court next week, sometime after April 14, to be examined by the Prosecution and present further evidence.

  4. Former NINTH CIRCLE participants whose evidence was presented in Court last Tuesday, April 8 testify that Cree Indians in northern Canada are being continually targeted by the Circle for torture and murder because of the valuable uranium resources on their lands which are coveted by the United States military and corporations associated with the NINTH CIRCLE and their adherents within both the American and Canadian governments. The names of prominent Canadian and American politicians and corporate officials who engage in these Circle ritual killings have been named in Court and entered into the evidence record.

  5. The NINTH CIRCLE began at least three centuries ago in the Vatican but has expanded to embrace local satanic child sacrifice cults across Europe and the Americas. Thanks to Catholic pressure, the Circle affiliated strongly with Nazi cultic groups that had close ties with the Waffen S.S. during the 1930′s and ’40′s, including the so-called KNIGHTS OF DARKNESS, whose members included former Pope Benedict, Joseph Ratzinger. Many of these members continued their murderous acts against children after World War Two, especially in Canada. Testimony was received from the sole survivor of a Knights of Darkness cult at the former Royal Canadian Air Force Base known as Lincoln Park in Calgary, Alberta. The Witness observed the ritual torture and killing of twenty abducted children by a former SS doctor and three other “Knights” working under cover as Canadian military personnel, between the years 1956 and 1958. Records of the SS doctor codenamed “Major Bob Armstrong” (SS number “091374 SS“) have been confirmed by Canadian government documents obtained by the Court from a former official of the Canadian Military Intelligence Agency, the NIS.

  6. Other witnesses to NINTH CIRCLE cults confirm the presence of British Royal Family members MOUNTBATTEN and PRINCE PHILIP at these child sacrifices, whose presence was concealed by defendant WELBY. Jesuit officers including defendants PACHON and BERGOGLIO were also present at the same rituals at Carnarvon Castle in Wales and at an undisclosed French Chateau, during the 1980′s and 1990′s. Similar sacrifices were conducted at Catholic and Anglican Indian residential schools in Kamloops, British Columbia and Brantford, Ontario during the 1960′s and earlier, according to statements from living and deceased indigenous eyewitnesses.

      7. A massive child trafficking network operating through official Roman Catholic adoption, “planned parenthood” and   foster care agencies was  described by a witness with inside knowledge of this network and its coordination through a special office at the Vatican. This office siphons children into NINTH CIRCLE cultic activity and child sexual trafficking networks around the world, according to another witness, a former employee of the Curia in Rome.

     8. An eyewitness to the personal involvement of Pope Francis, Jorge Bergoglio, in such child trafficking in Argentina during the reign of the military Junta has presented his affidavit to the Court. He is a former civil servant with the Junta and is in protected custody in Spain. He will appear before the Court to corroborate his statement.

Further evidence of the Prosecution will be disclosed in upcoming bulletins, and according to the decisions of the Court Magistrates.


Issued by the Public Information Agency of The Citizen Prosecutor’s Office of the Court.
Brussels
10 April, 2014
www.iclcj.com 

Apr
03

Attempt to Enforce Citizen Arrest Warrant against Queen Elizabeth II in Rome

Notification from the Sheriff’s Office of the Rome branch of The International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ)
3 April, 2014, 6 pm GMT


Internal Communique
Rome and Brussels
l

Today, two duly appointed sheriffs of our Office attempted to enforce the standing Citizen Arrest Warrant (ICLCJ Court Order No. 02252013-004, Dated 4 March, 2013) against Elizabeth Windsor aka Queen Elizabeth II during her presence in Rome, and bring her into custody as a convicted felon and a fugitive from justice.

Their report is filed with our Office, and reads as follows:

“I, Domingo Santori, accompanied by Carlo Freschi, attempted to apprehend Elizabeth Windsor and place her under arrest as a convicted criminal, in accordance with the Brussels Court Order of March 4, 2013.

“At about 11:50 am today Rome time we approached the reported site of her meeting with President Napolitano at the Presidential Palace in Rome and discovered from a Palace official that the meeting had been moved to an undisclosed location. The lack of any security at the Palace that day seemed to confirm his statement. We then intended to apprehend Windsor later when she met with Pope Francis at the Domus Sanctae Marthae near to the Vatican.                .

“Upon reaching the Domus at 1:05 pm, we were met by a sizable security force consisting of members of the National Police but no members of Vatican Security, which was highly unusual. It is our impression that the National Police knew of our intention and were waiting for us.

“We presented the Arrest Warrant to the Captain in charge of the National Police and informed him of our intent to enforce the Court Order and asked for his assistance in this legal procedure. The Captain would not agree to do so and refused to identify himself. He told us we would be placed under arrest if we tried to perform the arrest or “threaten the Pope” in any way. Several policemen then seized our video camera and roughly escorted us from the area. Our camera was not returned to us. We have lodged a formal complaint with the National Police.

“It is clear to us that the Italian government is actively colluding in protecting the convicted criminal Elizabeth Windsor. We recommend that greater force be employed by us in the future and that we rely on better intelligence on the movements of those to be arrested or served. We also ask the Court to issue a formal note of protest to the Italian government for its actions today and that the Court attempt to deputize local police forces to help us.

“On a final note of interest, we were told by one of the policemen at the Domus who assaulted us that ‘You guys are just wasting your time anyway, Il Papa (the Pope) isn’t even in there.’ We are not convinced that the alleged meetings between Elizabeth Windsor and the Pope and the President actually took place in the manner described in the world media. The absence of any Vatican Security at the Domus that day was noticeable and unusual, since it is considered Vatican property.

“We have also noted the cover story being circulated in the world media today that Pope Francis met with Elizabeth Windsor at the Vatican. We know this to be false and that their actual meeting occurred in an undisclosed location after they initially met at the Domus, which is the so-called ‘Pope’s’ private residence.”

Signed, D. Santori and counter signed by C. Freschi,

International Common Law Court Sheriffs, Rome Office of the Court

6 pm GMT

April 3, 2013

Issued by ITCCS Central and the International Common Law Court of Justice

 

 

 

Mar
31

Open Letter to the Joint Chiefs

Date: March 29,  2014

 

To: General Martin Dempsey; Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff

cc:@Martin_Dempsey

@stavridisj

@General Clark

@thejointstaff

 

From: Roseanne Barr;

Activist; Writer;

Peace and Freedom Party

 

Subject: Analysis of The Special Relationship with The United States and Royal Family of Great Britain

 

To General Dempsey:

Given the current geo-political environment it is vital to examine the role of the Royal Family as the main instigator of global conflict for the past 100 years. The Royal Family has advocated openly or indirectly the following conflicts:

  1. World War 1: Instigated by the firing of Chancellor Bismarck. (Germany)
  2. World War 2: Instigated by the Royal Family with the aide of Prescott Bush.
  3. Vietnam War: Instigated by the Royal Families of the U.K. and France, with France wanting their pre war colony back.
  4. Iraq War 1: Instigated by the Saudi and Kuwait Royal Families, satellite puppets of the British Commonwealth.
  5. Iraq War 2: Instigated by George Bush 2, grandson of Hitler financier Prescott Bush.
  6. Afghanistan War: Instigated by Saudi Arabia who were involved in the attacks of September 11, 2001.
  7. Attempted War with the United States and Syria, instigated by the Queen of England to Destroy Russia.
  8. Attempted War with United States and Russia. In February of 2014 The United States, U.K. and The EU financed Neo Nazi’s to take over the government of Ukraine.

 

The Royal Family has instigated directly or indirectly every geo political conflict for over the last 100 years. With Germany moving to integrate more towards Russia and China, its no longer possible to coexist with the Royal Family and their Malthusian Proclivities. China is playing a constructive roll in its efforts to integrate with Germany and Russia highlighted by their quest to rebuild the Silk Road. Russia has played a constructive role in its anti drug policy and their cooperation with anti terrorism. The question must be asked what constructive role has the House of Windsor played in global events in the last 100 years? Should the military consider the British Royal Family a direct strategic  threat to the United States? We went to war against Britain for a reason. Have we forgotten?

Sincerely,

 

Roseanne Barr

Peace and Freedom Party

United States of America

 

 

 

Footnotes:

 

  1. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/7815069/Prince-of-Wales-calls-for-population-control-in-developing-world.html

 

  1. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-15449959

 

  1. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills

 

  1. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-23213741

 

  1. http://www.anzacs.net/PreludeWar.htm

 

6. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar

 

  1. https://jones.house.gov/press-release/media-advisory-jones-and-lynch-host-press-conference-resolution-declassify-911-report

 

8. http://www.amazon.com/Treason-America-Aaron-Averell-Harriman-ebook/dp/B005VHDR1G/ref=dp_kinw_strp_1

 

 

  1. http://www.amazon.com/Dope-Inc-Drove-Henry-Kissinger/dp/0943235022

 

  1. http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/all_publications/living_planet_report/2012_lpr/

 

11. http://hilo.hawaii.edu/academics/hohonu/documents/Vol10x19TsarAlexanderIIandPresidentAbrahamLincoln.pdf

Mar
29

Kesha Rogers sounds off on Obama, backlash from TX Dems

Posted: Mar 28, 2014 4:29 PM PDT Updated: Mar 28, 2014 4:29 PM PDT

By: Shaun Rabb

Read more: http://www.myfoxdfw.com/story/25104749/kesha-rogers-sounds-off-on-obama-backlash-from-tx-dems#ixzz2xPPljysd

Kesha Rogers, who calls herself a LaRouche Democrat, is in a runoff to take on U.S. Senator John Cornyn, but the Democratic Party doesn’t want her.

Democrats have been mounting a campaign against Rogers, saying she doesn’t stand for what the party believes in.

But Rogers says Texas Democrats are making a mistake pushing against her campaign for U.S. Senate.

“When you have the one of the representatives, Marc Veasey, who comes out and says that his primary goal is to stop Kesha Rogers, that’s his mission and you’re a Congress member?” said Rogers. “But the key thing right now, we have to impeach this president. He has been in violation of the Constitution.”

“You have consistently called for crusting Wall Street and impeaching the president,” said FOX 4′s Shaun Rabb. “Tell us why.”

“You have a president who is about to lead us into an extinction war, thermonuclear war on behalf of the British and Wall Street financial interest, and nobody’s taking that up,” said Rogers.

“The target is Russia,” said Rogers. “The target is China, and that’s what you’re dealing with right now, and the reason that’s happening is because the whole financial system is bankrupt, so the financial interests of Wall Street and the City of London, that’s the only recourse that they have right now is to go for war.”

“And you’re saying that President Obama is moving at the direction of the British,” said Rabb.

“Yes, he supports that,” said Rogers.

Rogers is in the May 27 runoff against Dr. David Alameel for the Democratic Senate nomination.

Alameel was set to interview with FOX 4, but his manager called and said they were in San Antonio. When they realized FOX 4 is in Dallas, they said they could not make the interview.

“This guy will not debate me,” said Rogers. “If he’s really qualified to lead this state and lead this nation, tell him to come to the table. Bring forth the debate, bring forth the issues.”

“Should you beat him, do you think the Democrat Party in Texas will get behind your campaign against the incumbent, Senator Cornyn?” said Rabb.

“If they don’t then that’s gonna be the downfall of the Democratic Party,” said Rogers.

Read more: http://www.myfoxdfw.com/story/25104749/kesha-rogers-sounds-off-on-obama-backlash-from-tx-dems#ixzz2xPP3Y0x2

Mar
26

Last Comic Standing

photo-17 copy

Roseanne Barr, Keenen Ivory Wayans and Russell Peters make up the new judging panel, with J.B. Smoove hosting the 13-episode revamp premiering May 22.

A Reunion with Roseanne

Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images
Roseanne Barr

NBC’s revived comedy competition Last Comic Standing has unveiled its new host and judges.

J.B. Smoove will take the reins as host of the eighth season 13-episode revamp, with celebrity judges Roseanne Barr, Keenen Ivory Wayansand Russell Peters.

The new effort, executive produced by Wanda Sykes,Page Hurwitz and Javier Winnik, will launch with a two-hour premiere on Thursday, May 22 from 9-11 p.m., with Last Comic airing in its regular Thursdays at 10 p.m. starting the following week.

“We are ready to bring back the funny with this relaunch of Last Comic Standing, and can’t wait to discover the next great stand-up,” said Paul Telegdy, president alternative and late night programming, NBC Entertainment. “With Keenen, Roseanne and Russell set as our new judges, J.B. as host and Wanda, Page and Javier at the helm, there will be plenty of laughter all summer.”

Part of the grand prize on Last Comic includes an NBC talent deal and a half-hour scripted project to be developed by sister studio Universal Television.

Last Comic‘s return to television comes after a three-year absence on NBC’s schedule. A regular summer staple, previous hosts for the competition series had included Jay Mohr,Anthony ClarkBill BellamyFearne Cotton and Craig Robinson

Mar
23

Open Letter to Barack Obama: If you love America and its children, Do not go to Rome

An Open Letter to Barack Obama: If you love America and its children, Do not go to Rome

by Rev. Kevin D. Annett, M.A., M.Div. – Nobel Peace Prize Nominee in 2013 and 2014

March 24, 2014

Dear Mr. President,

Like you, I am the father of two daughters, and so no-one has to convince me that you love Malia and Sasha without condition, and would die to protect them from anyone and any power that would harm them. That love for our children is born in us because the sanctity of every child is a divine condition that is higher than any law on earth, or any authority, as Jesus himself reminded us.

And so as a fellow parent, I am deeply troubled by your decision to visit the Vatican onMarch 27 and parlay with an institution that is engaged not only in the systematic torture and trafficking of children, but by its aiding and concealment of that crime is actively subverting the sovereignty and the laws of the United States of America.

Since you have taken a public oath under God to protect the people of America and their Constitution from all foreign enemies, and to not give comfort to such enemies, it escapes me how your discussions with Pope Francis can do anything but legitimate, and thereby aid and abet, a power that meets some of the requirements of a terrorist organization under American domestic security laws.

Please understand that this is not a question of religion, but of the law. No organization or official that traffics in children, or that protects those who do, is above prosecution. And many Catholics are appalled at the still-binding canon law known as Crimen Sollicitatonas, which requires that all Catholic clergy assist child rapists in their church by concealing that crime, silencing their little victims, and actively obstructing justice by not disclosing anything to the police. For all of his talk of reform, the present Pope, Jorge Bergoglio, has not only refused to rescind this murderous law, but has in fact entrenched it: a clear crime under international law and a sure indication of a massive criminal conspiracy.

Since I trust in the efficiency of the CIA, Mr. President, I am sure they have briefed you on the growing evidence linking Pope Francis with the disappearance and trafficking of children of political prisoners in Argentina during that country’s Dirty Wars. The Pope has in fact been summoned to appear before a Common Law court in Brussels to answer these charges, just a few days after he meets with you.

I will not presume to begin to appreciate the enormous burdens of your office, and the pressures and influences you face and must contend with. One of your fellow Illinoisans, Abraham Lincoln, once remarked that it was only through prayer and divine guidance that his mortal frame was capable of enduring the crushing weight brought by the deaths of so many Americans in the civil war. But Mr. President, many young Americans are still dying, except they have no arms with which to defend themselves against the church-sponsored terrorists who violate them and ruin their lives, and reduce them to an inner, lifelong slavery no less odious than the quite legal and institutionalized bondage that held your own people.

Abraham Lincoln was once asked by a group of Baptist clergymen about his belief in God. He answered them,

“For me, gentlemen, my religion is that when I do good I feel good; when I do wrong I feel wrong.”

Mr. President, I ask you to think of your children, and of all children, and to ask yourself whether you feel good at what the Vatican has done and is doing by its policy of facilitating massive child rape in America and around the world; by its direct role in the deaths of untold numbers of children in Catholic orphanages, schools and sweatshops; and by its open defiance of America’s criminal and child protection laws that you are sworn to uphold and defend as you would your own children.

In 1846, Henry Thoreau, who helped salvage the soul of America, wrote these immortal words from the Massachusetts prison he occupied for refusing to fund an unjust war:

“Knowledge of what is right can no more be severed from consequential action than a living man can halt his own breath.”

Mr. President, you know what is right and what is wrong: no church or pope had to teach it to you. And it is wrong for America to fund a criminal body like the Vatican, as well as being quite illegal under International Law and especially the Nuremberg Statutes, which make all rulers accountable for their actions under the law.

As the President, sir, you are not empowered to compel your fellow Americans to aid and abet criminal regimes that maim and destroy innocent children. And yet existing “financial concordat” agreements between America and the Vatican use taxpayers’ money to do precisely that. And your actions in having a cordial visit with the chief executive officer of that openly criminal regime in Vatican City will reduce what you know is right to a sham and a lie, and will broadcast to the world that institutionalized child rape and trafficking is acceptable in the sight of America.

It is a time of war, once again. Sabres are being rattled in the Ukraine, and perhaps it is politically expedient for you to visit Pope Francis now and win another ally in this latest cold war with Russia. But if it does not profit any man to gain the entire world by prostituting his immortal soul, Mr. President, would you do so for a momentary political alliance?

Barack, the lives of countless children unborn are in your hands at this very moment. Do not treat with those who will destroy them. Do not go to Rome. Send a message that will reverberate like a Second Emancipation Proclamation to every terrorized child and family, and proclaim to the Vatican that the age of church-sponsored murder of the innocent is finally over.

In closing, Mr. President, let me offer you my prayers, to you and your wife and daughters, as well as this remembrance of a less momentous but equally difficult decision I had to make once about who and what I would serve as a moral man. Perhaps it will help you.

In 1994, as a serving clergyman of the United Church of Canada, I was asked to cooperate in the concealment of the torture, rape and slaughter of thousands of aboriginal children in the Indian “schools” run by my employer as well as the Catholics and the Anglicans. I said no, and as a result I lost my own family, my job, and my livelihood. But from my action and its terrible personal pain, we all won a moral victory that has saved the lives of many children since then, as the truth of that Canadian genocide has now allowed a new generation to begin recovering from yet another Vatican-sponsored crime against humanity.

Doing the right thing with regards to the Vatican may cost you your much, Mr. President, but it would secure life and liberty and happiness for legions of the innocents who would forever praise your name and the name of an America that stood on the right side of humanity. Who could ever ask for a greater opportunity to win such a victory for right, simply by acting on what he knows is right?

Trust God, Mr. President, and put not your faith in fellow princes or in their lies. May the blessings of Christ be on all of us now, and on our children, who look to you.

Kevin Annett

www.itccs.org

 

 

Mar
22

West prepares for war with Russia

From News Source  http://vpk-news.ru/news/19567
Translated from Russian
West prepares for war with Russia
President of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems , Doctor of Military Sciences Konstantin Sivkov commented re NATO tactical aviation for the use of nuclear weapons, which , in his opinion , could be a sign of preparation for war with Russia
Crimea voted for annexation to Russia , despite intense diplomatic and informational pressure on the Russian leadership . The reaction of Western elites at the moment has been very low-key , it is not such as could be expected , judging by the size and strength of the previous pressure . While no serious economic sanctions taken. Tightening their adoption reduces the relevance and validity of these measures , particularly in the context of developments in Ukraine, in particular , the inevitable has a relatively near-term economic collapse.
Meanwhile, the Crimea to Russia in the world is perceived as a heavy defeat on the United States. Indeed, virtually all serious analysts and politicians clear that the events in Ukraine have been initiated by the United States. And as a result – the loss of control and radical developments strengthen the position of Russia on the Black Sea . It looks even more contrast in the context of what Egypt reoriented to Russia and this helps him in Saudi Arabia, allocating $ 3 billion for the purchase of Russian weapons. For the U.S., this means one thing – a very serious and further reducing the influence of the Middle East and North Africa , the loss of a chance to regain control over the resources of these key regions.
In these circumstances, it is necessary to wait for the U.S. strategy of behavior change , because the current was ineffective . Just as it happened with the advent of Barack Obama , when instead of “brute force” the Americans tried to move to the use of “soft” .
In this context, very revealing is the sudden decision of the U.S. leadership in Europe to increase the potential of tactical nuclear weapons . Be equipped with F-16 fighters and five Air Force Tornado NATO equipment, allowing to use nuclear bombs B61- 12. What is very significant , it is supposed to equip the Air Force planes of which are now considered non-nuclear : Belgium, the Netherlands , Turkey, Germany and Italy. Conversion of aircraft expected to be completed by 2018. The same equipment to be equipped with all incoming weapons promising fighter F- 35. It is quite obvious that these works are carried out not just. If the aircraft is given the opportunity to use nuclear weapons , then plans to make it there . A political statement about the impossibility of its transfer to non-nuclear powers – just informational masking . When it comes time need all these statements and assurances easily discarded. How many times it was demonstrated by Western elites .
It is interesting that this whole “nuclear boom” comes amid talk of ” nuclear zero .” What can this mean ?
Quite possibly , these events are a sign of a new turn in American politics. Failure of the ” peripheral strategy ” – a movement along an arc spanning Eurasia from the south , may push the Western elite , under time pressure , a more radical action – a direct attack on Russia , as the most dangerous and at the same time a core of non-Western civilizations in the block – BRICS .
In this context, capacity building of tactical nuclear weapons in Europe is quite clear : to achieve excellence in these kinds of weapons over Russia . If this is the United States will be able to do this, then it is quite possible Russian aggression against all the might of NATO. Such an attack weakened the Russian army will not stand . Russia’s transition to the use of tactical nuclear weapons would be very difficult threat of retaliation. In addition, if applied theater nuclear war would be Europe , not the U.S. . Probably American leadership suggests that Russia , fighting against NATO in the European theater of war, would not dare use of strategic nuclear forces against the United States , fearing retaliation. It is possible to have a payment proactive neutralize Russia’s strategic nuclear potential.
In any case , the decision to radically strengthen the capacity of tactical nuclear weapons in Europe – it’s a sign the U.S. began preparing for war with Russia . More in Europe tactical nuclear weapons not fight with anyone. The possibility of such a development is confirmed by the findings of incomplete adequacy of Western elites and their ability to go to a completely barbaric actions if necessary.
Russia must be ready for this . In the military- technical terms , it is first necessary to avoid reducing their own arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons , and to ensure rapid re- strategic nuclear forces , primarily to develop and adopt a new heavy ICBM . It may be worthwhile to develop a rocket for heavy missile cruisers of Project 941 . Permissible weight of a missile – about 90 tons, will place on them particularly powerful missile .